mtx: Make idle thread assertions more robust

[jhb]

Summary

Just print the pointer to the mutex instead of the name in case the
mutex is corrupted.

[markj]

sys/kern/kern_mutex.c

292

Don't you want to do the same thing here?

454

Ditto.

[markj]

sys/kern/kern_mutex.c

292

Ignore me, I read the patches in the wrong order.

[kib]

In principle, it might be not a sleep mutex.

[olce]

I suspect that not outputting the lock name (provided lock_object is not corrupted) is not a big deal for this assertion.

If you feel that could be a concern, here and in D49313 m->lock_object.lo_name could perhaps be replaced by a call to a tiny helper function that will check if the class of lock_object is valid and then only try to print the lock name on success (this is not an absolute guarantee, but may well be enough), else just print the address of m.

[jhb]

In D49314#1124614, @kib wrote:

In principle, it might be not a sleep mutex.

I suppose we could just say "mutex"