No functional change intended.
MFC after: 3 days
Hi @kp , I'd like to commit them separately so it will easy to MFC.
Should all of them have same meta Differential Revision: ?
Change looks good, but the commit message should be more descriptive:
Use the existing CTLFLAG_RDTUN and CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag definitions when possible, instead of separated flags.
In D39466#898398, @hselasky wrote: Change looks good, but the commit message should be more descriptive: Use the existing CTLFLAG_RDTUN and CTLFLAG_RWTUN flag definitions when possible, instead of separated flags.
Agreed. That sounds better than solely one line No functional change intended. .
In D39466#898395, @zlei wrote: Hi @kp , I'd like to commit them separately so it will easy to MFC. Should all of them have same meta Differential Revision: ?
Yeah, just point them all at this one.
In D39466#898724, @kp wrote: In D39466#898395, @zlei wrote: Hi @kp , I'd like to commit them separately so it will easy to MFC. Should all of them have same meta Differential Revision: ? Yeah, just point them all at this one.
Phabricator is not smart. This review is closed by dc1c5138c325 and the revision history only reflect dc1c5138c325 .