Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

freebsd-update(8): Add -j flag to support jails
ClosedPublic

Authored by kfv_kfv.io on Jul 18 2020, 12:24 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F102538366: D25711.id74610.diff
Wed, Nov 13, 6:48 PM
F102537667: D25711.id80603.diff
Wed, Nov 13, 6:33 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 10:27 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 10:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 9:55 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Oct 22, 8:23 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Oct 15, 8:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 30 2024, 1:02 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Make freebsd-update(8) support jails by adding the -j flag which takes jail jid or name as an argument. This requires and depends on D25705 since it uses freebsd-version -j jail to get the version of the installed userland.

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

bcr requested changes to this revision.Jul 18 2020, 9:38 AM
bcr added a subscriber: bcr.
bcr added inline comments.
usr.sbin/freebsd-update/freebsd-update.8
99

s/the/The/

101

The sentence stop is missing here.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jul 18 2020, 9:38 AM

The man page looks good now, thanks!

Any updates on the src part of the change?

I think we won't progress here if we don't get someone else to review the src parts.
@cperciva: Can you take a look at it?

dteske requested changes to this revision.Dec 11 2020, 4:43 PM

Just a simple bogon in the src bits, after which I will approve

usr.sbin/freebsd-update/freebsd-update.sh
332

I would use NR instead of FNR here simply because FNR has the additional complexity that it will reset to 1 when working on the next file, but when used to process a pipe stream it is in-essence working on a single file (/dev/stdin) and thus NR and FNR are always aligned making the use of FNR a bit of a bogon

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 11 2020, 4:43 PM

Fixed. Thanks for the neat point, I'll keep it in mind.

Fixing my previous mistake - my apologies.

Sorry again, it must be good this time.

@bcr: I think we could proceed now. Please note, that a very little change was made in D25705 where this diff relies on, and if you or anyone approve differentials, I think we can have them landed in 13.0-RELEASE, right? Please let me know if there is anything else I need to improve and update.

Just a simple bogon in the src bits, after which I will approve

However, not essential to change. In thinking further about this, FNR prevents a future change if FNR is indeed necessary.

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Oct 1 2021, 6:51 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.