vtnet: Account for the padding when selecting allocation size

While we account for the padding in the length of the mbuf we use, we do
not account for it when we 'guess' the size of the mbuf to allocate
based in the MTU of the device. This leads to a situation where we might
fail if the mtu is close to a bucket size (say 2018) such that the added
padding would push us over the edge for a full-sized packet. mtu of 2018
is super rare (2016 and 2020 would both work), but fix it none-the-less.
It's a shame we can't just set VTNET_RX_HEADER_PAD to 2 in this case. The 4
seems hard-coded somewhere I've not found documented (I think it's in the
protocol given the comments about VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT).

Sponsored by: Netflix
Reviewed by: bz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43656