Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

13.1 relnotes: Add entries for most of the Relnotes: notations in log
ClosedPublic

Authored by karels on Apr 11 2022, 2:51 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F109718538: D34881.diff
Sat, Feb 8, 5:08 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Feb 3, 4:43 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 23 2024, 1:11 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 15 2024, 2:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Nov 15 2024, 12:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 18 2024, 10:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 23 2024, 7:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 15 2024, 6:48 PM

Details

Summary

Add entries suggested by most of the "Relnotes: yes" or "maybe"
entries in the git log for releng/13.1 since the 13.0 release.

Individual sections reviewed by mm (ZFS and libarchive), bz (iwlwifi),
cperciva (EC2-related items).

Test Plan

tested in local build

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 45122
Build 42010: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

karels created this revision.
pauamma_gundo.com added inline comments.
website/content/en/releases/13.1R/relnotes.adoc
181

If this means "provided it matches the fingerprint computed for the host key received", I'd make that explicit. Maybe;

When prompting whether to record a new host key, answering with a fingerprint instead of "yes" or "no" will compare it against the fingerprint of the host key received and accept it if they match

271

One sentence per line.

353
This revision now requires changes to proceed.Apr 11 2022, 10:47 PM

I was also wondering whether I should change the older entries from the imperative "Add ..." to "... was added" etc. That should be a separate commit though. Comments?

website/content/en/releases/13.1R/relnotes.adoc
181

Hmm, I would have thought that was the only fingerprint in question. The following is a bit less verbose; what do you think?

When prompting whether to record a new host key, accept that key's fingerprint as a synonym for "yes"

271

There are many other entries with "Sponsored by" on the same line, or with multiple sentences per line (including the sample entry, and the entire introduction). Should I fix them all? Or maybe just the new entries in this commit?

353

Oops, I thought I had fixed that one. Copy and paste from Colin's addition.

I was also wondering whether I should change the older entries from the imperative "Add ..." to "... was added" etc. That should be a separate commit though. Comments?

Separate commit, if worth doing. (I have no opinion on that point other than "would it keep release notes from being ready in time?")

website/content/en/releases/13.1R/relnotes.adoc
181

That wording works for me.

271

Just the new ones, I think.

Change new items to use only one sentence per line; other touchups.

Minor nit, can be fixed before committing.

website/content/en/releases/13.1R/relnotes.adoc
104
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 12 2022, 9:08 PM