Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

ssh: Add git tag push to upgrade instructions
ClosedPublic

Authored by emaste on Dec 21 2021, 7:02 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 4, 8:21 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 15 2024, 7:25 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 30 2024, 10:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 21 2024, 4:05 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 18 2024, 1:33 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 18 2024, 7:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 17 2024, 3:26 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 17 2024, 10:01 AM
Subscribers
None

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

emaste created this revision.

From https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/committers-guide/#git-primer 5.4.4 , I think we can use git push --follow-tags freebsd vendor/openssh

I think we can use git push --follow-tags freebsd vendor/openssh

Interesting, that seems like it would push a bunch of extraneous tags:

$ git push --dry-run --follow-tags freebsd vendor/openssh
To ssh://gitrepo.freebsd.org/src.git
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201127 -> freebsd-main-20201127
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201201 -> freebsd-main-20201201
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201204 -> freebsd-main-20201204
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201211 -> freebsd-main-20201211
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201218 -> freebsd-main-20201218
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20201225 -> freebsd-main-20201225
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210101 -> freebsd-main-20210101
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210108 -> freebsd-main-20210108
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210115 -> freebsd-main-20210115
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210122 -> freebsd-main-20210122
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210129 -> freebsd-main-20210129
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210205 -> freebsd-main-20210205
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210212 -> freebsd-main-20210212
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210219 -> freebsd-main-20210219
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210226 -> freebsd-main-20210226
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210305 -> freebsd-main-20210305
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210312 -> freebsd-main-20210312
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210319 -> freebsd-main-20210319
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210326 -> freebsd-main-20210326
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210402 -> freebsd-main-20210402
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210409 -> freebsd-main-20210409
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210416 -> freebsd-main-20210416
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210423 -> freebsd-main-20210423
 * [new tag]                   freebsd-main-20210430 -> freebsd-main-20210430
 * [new tag]                   upstream/8.1.0 -> upstream/8.1.0
 * [new tag]                   vendor/libcbor/0.8.0 -> vendor/libcbor/0.8.0
 * [new tag]                   vendor/libfido2/1.8.0 -> vendor/libfido2/1.8.0

This includes tags that are not anywhere on the vendor/openssh branch. The final two tags should be in the upstream repo (as part of the libfido2/libcobr vendor imports). I'm not sure about the upstream/8.1.0 tag. I believe the freebsd-main-20xxxxxx tags came via CHERI.

It is possible that these are somehow an artifact of --dry-run, which does not connect to the server and is entirely client side, but it is surprising to me that tags outside of the given branch would be found.

commit 9adee7d03f2e4c91e6330410f88fb5addaf2a24a (tag: upstream/8.1.0, tag: release/8.1.0)
Author: Ken Smith <kensmith@FreeBSD.org>
Date:   Sat Jul 17 04:36:40 2010 +0000

    Ready for 8.1-RELEASE builds.
    
    Approved by:    re (implicit)

Notes:
    svn path=/releng/8.1/; revision=210187
    svn path=/release/8.1.0/; revision=210188; tag=release/8.1.0

@lwhsu @imp any comment on git push --follow-tags seemingly pushing undesired tags?
(We may want to update the git primer if this is indeed an issue that needs to be worked around.)

@lwhsu @imp any comment on git push --follow-tags seemingly pushing undesired tags?

It doesn't push undesirable tags. It only pushes annotated (including signed) tags. I have dozens of tags in my tree that it won't push when I do a vendor update when I follow the instructions to push the tag like this. I'm unsure why --dry-run is tagging them.

The freebsd-main-XXXXXXXX tags in my --dry-run are annotated tags

e.g.

tag freebsd-main-20201127
Tagger: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Date:   Fri Oct 1 18:28:03 2021 +0100

FreeBSD main November 27, 2020

commit a36179937e7e768d1840896ac1ea13ba6f118a09 (tag: freebsd-main-20201127)
Author: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org>
Date:   Fri Nov 27 21:38:03 2020 +0000

    addr2line: add label checks when DW_AT_range and DW_AT_low_pc cannot be used
    
    Check label's ranges for address we want to translate if a CU doesn't
    have usable DW_AT_range or DW_AT_low_pc.
    
    Use more appropriate names: "struct CU" -> "struct range"
    
    Developed as part of upstream ELF Tool Chain bug report
    https://sourceforge.net/p/elftoolchain/tickets/552/ although this does
    not address the specific case reported there.
    
    Submitted by:   Tiger Gao <tig@freebsdfoundation.org>
    MFC after:      1 month
    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
    Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23782

Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=368114

from git docs:

--follow-tags

Push all the refs that would be pushed without this option, and also push annotated tags in refs/tags that are missing from the remote but are pointing at commit-ish that are reachable from the refs being pushed.

So I think this does include undesired annotated tags that exist in the local repo.

So I think this does include undesired annotated tags that exist in the local repo.

Oh, wait - I don't think any of those should be reachable from "the refs being pushed" which should be only ones in vendor/openssh.

@imp could you try --dry-run and see if additional tags are listed?

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Feb 23 2022, 6:51 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.