commit 012db04c9b7525d097c88189e5616d63c3510903 Author: Adam Wolk <a.wolk@fudosecurity.com> Date: Thu May 20 20:57:36 2021 +0200 rc.subr: use _pidcmd to determine pid for protect This is a more reliable method that accounts for existing pidfiles, procname and interpreter settings. Current method of obtaining the pid for oomprotect="YES"|"ALL" processes in certain cases fails to find a unique pid. One such case are rc.d scripts defining command as: command="daemon" which results in all processes started via daemon being selected and passed to protect(1) which fails and prints usage: $ /etc/rc.d/exampled restart Stopping exampled. Starting exampled. usage: protect [-i] command protect [-cdi] -g pgrp | -p pid Running the same with -x reveals what happens: + pid='3051 4268 4390 4421 4427 4470 4588 4733 4740 4870 4949 4954 4979 5835 5866 55487 55583 56525 57643 57789 57882 58072 58167 99419' + /usr/bin/protect -p 3051 4268 4390 4421 4427 4470 4588 4733 4740 4870 4949 4954 4979 5835 5866 55487 55583 56525 57643 57789 57882 58072 58167 99419 usage: protect [-i] command protect [-cdi] -g pgrp | -p pid We have a more reliable way of obtaining pid already defined in rc.subr and available when protect(1) needs it. We can simply `eval $_pidcmd` which also invokes `check_process` but properly accounts for existing pidfile, procname and interpreter settings. With the change the pidfile is properly obtained. Sponsored by: Fudo Security
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable