PowerPC kernel is of DYN type and it has a base address where it is initially loaded, before being relocated.
As the start address passed to pmcstat_image_link() is where the kernel was relocated to, but the symbols always use the original base address, we need to subtract it to get the correct offset.
Details
- Reviewers
bdragon jhibbits - Group Reviewers
PowerPC - Commits
- rS367392: pmcstat: fix PPC kernel symbol resolution
Diff Detail
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped - Build Status
Buildable 33095 Build 30467: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Makes sense to me. Is there a good way to test this?
Additionally, I believe this would also be relevant to ppc32, perhaps use the __powerpc__ ifdef instead.
I've tested it on Talos with D26110, D26111, D26112 and D26113, to collect samples and produce a callgraph:
cd /tmp
dd if=/dev/zero of=ddtmp bs=1m count=2048 &
pmcstat -O sample.out -S INSTR_COMPLETED -l 5
pmcstat -R sample.out -G sample.graph
The dd is to force a predictable kernel load, to know what functions to expect in the output.
Then sample.graph should have symbols resolved correctly and shows tmpfs_write and uiomove_object among functions that spent most time.
(I have /tmp mounted as tmpfs)
You could probably test this on a G5 too, but you'll need D26111 if you start getting panics and D26112 to avoid addresses being truncated to 32-bit.
I can change the #ifdef to __powerpc__, but it would be nice if someone could test it on a PPC32 machine to make sure it works.