Details
- Reviewers
- None
- Group Reviewers
manpages - Commits
- rS354399: blacklist: update to NetBSD snapshot on 20191106
Diff Detail
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
| bin/blacklistd.c | ||
|---|---|---|
| 411 | This comes from commit 242b97578c81b692aa9e7edff06a4128b58708ef
Author: christos <christos@NetBSD.org>
Date: Wed Feb 27 02:20:18 2019 +0000
Instead of deleting the rules individually use flush to kill them all at
once for efficiently. Also when restoring, don't nuke the database
(Phil Rulon). | |
| diff/ssh.diff | ||
| 31–35 | from commit 828ba5364df6fe3b6fe72cd7fe506d3b47f5b2d9
Author: christos <christos@NetBSD.org>
Date: Mon Jun 26 17:12:05 2017 +0000
amend the patch to close. | |
Carrying around an openssh patch is far from ideal. Is there any chance it can be upstreamed?
The star changes look functionally fine.
I didn't look closely at the side effects / context of flush/restore changes. Nor ssh changes.
| bin/support.c | ||
|---|---|---|
| 105–117 | This is sure to produce wrong results. I guess it's fine if we're just using this to print durations? | |
Carrying around an openssh patch is far from ideal. Is there any chance it can be upstreamed?
Agreed. The patch isn't actually used in our build, it's just extra stuff being carried around. At first I'm just trying to sync up with NetBSD, and we can look at improving things from there.
| bin/support.c | ||
|---|---|---|
| 105–117 | I guess, it's less wrong than before anyway :) | |
Grammar suggestion for the man page.
| head/contrib/blacklist/bin/blacklistd.conf.5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ↗ | (On Diff #64005) | "files contains" sounds not right. I guess "contain" is better. |
| head/contrib/blacklist/bin/blacklistd.conf.5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ↗ | (On Diff #64005) | Or even "file contains" |