Update scalbn* functions to the musl versions
The only diff compared to musl is a minor change to scalbnl() to replace
musl's union ldshape with union IEEEl2bits.
This fixes the scalbn tests on non-x86 (since x86 has an assembly version
that is used instead).
Musl commit messages:
commit 8c44a060243f04283ca68dad199aab90336141db
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Mon Apr 3 02:38:13 2017 +0200
fix scalbn when result is in the subnormal range in nearest rounding mode scalbn could introduce double rounding error when an intermediate value and the final result were both in the subnormal range e.g. scalbn(0x1.7ffffffffffffp-1, -1073) returned 0x1p-1073 instead of 0x1p-1074, because the intermediate computation got rounded to 0x1.8p-1023. with the fix an intermediate value can only be in the subnormal range if the final result is 0 which is correct even after double rounding. (there still can be two roundings so signals may be raised twice, but that's only observable with trapping exceptions which is not supported.)
commit 2eaed464e2080d8321d3903b71086a1ecfc4ee4a
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Wed Sep 4 15:52:54 2013 +0000
math: use float_t and double_t in scalbnf and scalbn remove STRICT_ASSIGN (c99 semantics is assumed) and use the conventional union to prepare the scaling factor (so libm.h is no longer needed)
commit 1b77b9072f374bd26eb0574b83a0d5f18d75ec60
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Thu Aug 15 10:07:46 2013 +0000
math: minor scalbn*.c simplification
commit c4359e01303da2755fe7e8033826b132eb3659b1
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Tue Nov 13 10:55:35 2012 +0100
math: excess precision fix modf, modff, scalbn, scalbnf old code was correct only if the result was stored (without the excess precision) or musl was compiled with -ffloat-store. now we use STRICT_ASSIGN to work around the issue. (see note 160 in c11 section 6.8.6.4)
commit 666271c105e4137bdfa195e217799d74143370d4
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Tue Nov 13 10:30:40 2012 +0100
math: fix scalbn and scalbnf on overflow/underflow old code was correct only if the result was stored (without the excess precision) or musl was compiled with -ffloat-store. (see note 160 in n1570.pdf section 6.8.6.4)
commit 8051e08e10d2b739fcfcbc6bc7466e8d77fa49f1
Author: nsz <nsz@port70.net>
Date: Mon Mar 19 10:54:07 2012 +0100
simplify scalbn*.c implementations The old scalbn.c was wrong and slow, the new one is just slow. (scalbn(0x1p+1023,-2097) should give 0x1p-1074, but the old code gave 0)
Reviewed By: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28872